John Nallen talks about TV taking ad dollars from digital, RSNs, importance of programming rights at Deutsche Bank conference

John Nallen, Chief Financial Officer for 21st Century Fox, spoke with Deutsche Bank analyst Bryan Kraft at Deutsche Bank’s 24th Annual Media, Internet & Telecom Conference today. During the 45-minute discussion, John talked about how advertising dollars are flowing from digital to television, the strength of regional sports networks (RSNs) and the importance of having rights to shows, among other topics.

On the strength of the ad market: “Reflecting more on the ad market overall – I know there’s been a lot of discussion around this at this conference, and I think I’d probably echo what others have said: The market is very encouraging on a national basis. We’ve seen now great momentum over the last three quarters, so it was driven a year ago by fantasy sports and a couple of categories. Right now, it’s across the board. So it’s an auto, it’s telco, it’s mobile devices – this is national. And pricing is up 20-plus percent above upfront and the strength keeps coming.”

On the flow of ad dollars from digital to TV: “So what we’ve seen in conversations with the agencies and advertisers is that it’s not like their total budgets have increased. What they’ve done is rebalance spending from other places they were in, most notably digital, back to long-form, premium entertainment and sports, and that’s what we do. So we’ve enjoyed that.”

On RSNs going from strength to strength: “[The RSNs] continue to go from strength to strength. I look at it from a couple of different ways. First, from the team standpoint: We run 20-plus RSNs, we’ve got 44 teams, we reach 85 million households. From a team right rights standpoint, we don’t have any significant renewals coming up over the next three years. So our cost base is secure under contracts that go as long as 30 years for the Yankees and one that we’re in negotiations now that’s up in one year with the Clippers. But it’s a base that is, from a cost standpoint, pretty secure.”

On the importance of RSNs to local markets: “On the affiliate side, we just completed significant renewal and you didn’t hear a peep about the RSNs being negotiated off of a platform. It was down on a traditional basis with traditional volume and rates, and it was really no drama about the RSNs being up. Because in every case, the MVPDs recognize that the RSNs are so important to their local market product. You take New York – and I know we’re in discussion with MVPD in that market – the YES Network, when the Yankees are playing, is the No. 1 cable network in the market; it’s the No. 3 television network on that night in the market. So for an MVPD to offer its consumers a package that doesn’t have what is the most important television in the market would be pretty surprising. From a growth standpoint though, what you should look at is the RSNs are an enormous store of value for us. They are a very significant profit generator for the company.”

On the dispute between YES and Comcast: “I’d say that’s a negotiation between the two parties. So again I come back to the point that the YES Network – any of these networks, whether it’s in Detroit or in Florida here or in New York, these networks are pretty important to the consumers in that market and I think we will see a day where we will settle that and YES Network will be back on.”

On high expectations for STAR: “The beauty of it, at least the way we’re looking at it, is we are providing a bit of a canopy to Star to allow it to grow, so I don’t have to and go through quarter-by-quarter metrics and how its performance is going. Because that will just get in the way of its growth. The ad market is growing by 20 percent a year, cable and satellite households will grow by over 45 percent over the next three or four years, and Star will enjoy that ride along the way as the leader in the market. What we’ve done is launched the sports business, where in 2015 we took almost entirely the profits we generated on the entertainment side, which was near $300 million, and invested it into the sports business, to launch the sports business. And what you’re now seeing, as I said earlier, is that the peak investment is gone, the entertainment trajectory continues and now sports is continuing to grow. So we have a high degree of confidence around the two milestones we set for Star of $500 million in EBITDA in 2018 and $1 billion shortly thereafter… Star is really – when I look at the growth engines of the company overall, one of the top three is where we’re going with Star.”

On the Hotstar opportunity: “It’s an over-the-top product that’s entirely ad-supported. At Star, going back on the entertainment side, we produce and own all of our programming, except for movies that are on our movie channel. Everything else is owned and produced. We have all the IP for Star. So we put 40,000 hours of programing onto this over-the-top product called Hotstar. We also now broadcast sports, because we have a digital rights, across Hotstar. We had, I think in the first week, 40 million downloads of the Hotstar app, and we continue to get very significant engagement. It’s the kind of product that over time could be a subscription product. But that’s not what we’re doing right now. And most of the focus right now is on active engagement, principally on the Star entertainment product.”

On the success of “Deadpool” and implications for 21CF’s future: “We still have two very big movies ahead of us in the year with “X-Men” and “Independence Day,” and we’ve got great confidence in those films. But I’m not about to declare victory and re-guide the company based on that kind of activity. But you’re right – “Deadpool” unto itself has been a great jolt coupled with really slight change even since then on the strength of the advertising market. So I’d say there are more positives than negatives as we look at the rest of the year and we look into 2017. Remember, going into 2017, we’ve got basically three big events for our company that will help drive growth: We’ve got the Super Bowl, we’ve got the political tailwind that I described and we have the tailwind of a number of these big films coming into 2017. So we will have released two of them at the end of 2016 and spent all the money on marketing “Ice Age 5” in 2016, and we enjoy the benefits of that into fiscal 2017. So fiscal 2017 has three big pieces of momentum behind it that we’re looking forward to, as well as, we’re hopeful, a continued buoyancy behind the advertising market.”

On the strength of TV: “We had 36 series – 16 new, 20 returning – between the fall and what will end this summer before the upfronts. That was a very big slate for us. Roughly 70-75 percent of that is pointed toward FOX. This was part of the initiative we did when we put Gary [Newman] and Dana [Walden] in charge of both the television production business, which they had, and the network. So on the production side, like I said, 70-75 percent of the output is for our networks. On the broadcast side, if you take idle for the moment, 80 percent of what we’re showing is our product as well. So [20th Century Fox TV] is clearly one of the leaders in television production. They have 15 pilot orders already looking into next season. Not all of the announcements have been made about renewals of those 36 series that I mentioned, but there is a very substantial number that will be renewed yet again. So as a home for content and for long-form content, which is what we do – we do long-form, engaging, premium content; we’re not a short-form content house – TCFTV will continue to grow.”

On the importance of having rights to shows: “This whole shift to non-linear requires you to have the rights to that programming… So having full rights to that IP and being able to provide those rights to any platform is vitally important to your strategy now. You can’t disconnect the linear broadcast anymore from the opportunity for people to consume that in a non-linear basis. And if you don’t have those rights – if we have a show on linear but somebody else has the rights for non-linear, we’re just a showroom for their product. And that’s not the business that we’re in.”

To hear more of John’s discussion, listen to the recorded webcast.

2016 Big East men’s basketball tournament kicks off March 9 on FS1, FOX Sports GO app – and in virtual reality

FOX Sports is taking the Big East men’s basketball tournament where it’s never been before: virtual reality. The 2016 tournament, which kicks off Wednesday, March 9, at Madison Square Garden, will be aired on FS1 through the semifinals, with the final airing Saturday, March 12, on FOX. All games will be available for streaming on the FOX Sports GO app.

Thanks to a partnership between FOX Sports and NextVR, the quarterfinal, semifinal and championship games of the 2016 Big East Tournament will be broadcast around the world in virtual reality, a first for college basketball tournaments. A total of seven games and more than 15 hours of live virtual reality coverage will be streamed over a span of three days.

The live, high-definition virtual reality stream will include audio and graphics highlighted player stats, scores and game updates, according to the announcement.

“Fans want to be a part of the action and virtual reality takes the fan experience to the next level,” said Eric Shanks, FOX Sports President, COO and Executive Producer. “Our relationship with NextVR comes at a time as the demand to enjoy these amazing ‘like being there’ experiences expands.”

FOX Sports and NextVR partnered to air the Daytona 500 and a Premier Boxing Champions (PBC) fight in virtual reality earlier this year.

21st Century Fox is a leader in the creation of innovative virtual reality content, and 20th Century Fox is the first studio with an R&D center to drive the development of innovative technology and new consumer experiences across all digital platforms, in partnership with leading electronics companies. The Fox Innovation Lab introduced the proof-of-concept experience “Wild – The Experience” at CES last year. “The Martian VR Experience” was the lab’s first commercial virtual reality endeavor, in partnership with 20th Century Fox, RSA Films and The Virtual Reality Company.

In January, 21CF acquired a minority stake in Osterhout Design Group, a leading augmented and virtual reality and smartglasses designer and manufacturer.

The 2016 Big East Tournament starts Wednesday, March 9, at 7 p.m. EST on FS1 and FOX Sports GO. To see the rest of the schedule, go to FoxSports.com. Download the FOX Sports GO app to stream the games from your mobile device.

21CF and National Geographic Channel celebrate International Women’s Day by encouraging viewers to stand #withMalala

On Feb. 18, 21st Century Fox and the National Geographic Channel launched a new social media campaign to drive support and awareness for girls’ education. The initiative extends through March 10, giving viewers the chance to celebrate this year’s International Women’s Day by taking part in the campaign and contributing to the education of the more than 60 million young women who are out of school around the world. In celebration of National Geographic Channel’s global broadcast premiere of “He Named Me Malala” on Feb. 29, the campaign asks viewers to tweet with the hashtag #withMalala or change their Facebook profile to a special campaign video. For every post, 21CF will donate $1 to the Malala Fund, a nonprofit that empowers girls globally through education, for a total of up to $50,000.

Read the 21st Century Fox Social Impact post to learn more about the campaign, how Malala’s story is being told around the world and how you can take action on this International Women’s Day.

20th Century Fox Film wins four Oscars at the 2016 Academy Awards

20th Century Fox Film won four Oscars at the 88th Academy Awards on Sunday, Feb. 28. Here’s a list of their wins:

  • Best Directing: Alejandro G. Iñárritu for “The Revenant”
  • Best Actor: Leonardo DiCaprio for “The Revenant”
  • Best Cinematography: Emmanuel Lubezki for “The Revenant”
  • Best Supporting Actor: Mark Rylance for “Bridge of Spies”

Congratulations to 20th Century Fox Film for their wins and nominations, and to Fox Searchlight Pictures for their nominations.

Here are some photos from the event:

Photo credit: PictureGroup
Leonardo DiCaprio (Best Actor, “The Revenant”) and Alejandro G. Iñárritu (Best Director, “The Revenant”).

Photo credit: PictureGroup
Mark Rylance (Best Supporting Actor, “Bridge of Spies”).

Photo credit: PictureGroup
Matt Damon (nominated for Best Actor, “The Martian”) and Luciana Barroso.

Photo credit: PictureGroup
Saoirse Ronan (nominated for Best Actress, “Brooklyn”).

Photo credit: PictureGroup
Jennifer Lawrence (nominated for Best Actress, “Joy”).

Photo credit: PictureGroup
Tom Hardy (nominated for Best Supporting Actor, “The Revenant”) and Charlotte Riley.

‘The Last Man on Earth’ returns to FOX Sunday, March 6, at 9:30/8:30c for more post-apocalyptic laughs

Phil Miller thought he was the lone surviving human after a virus swept across the planet – but he was wrong, and now he’s living through a different kind of fallout. “The Last Man on Earth,” FOX’s post-apocalyptic comedy starring Will Forte as Phil (who now goes by his middle name, Tandy), is making its return Sunday, March 6, at 9:30/8:30c.

The series, in its second season, is making its spring premiere with an episode called “Pitch Black.” It features guest stars Jason Sudeikis and Jacob Tremblay, who join Will and the rest of the show’s cast: Kristen Schaal, January Jones, Mel Rodriguez, Mary Steenburgen and Cleopatra Coleman.

“We knew we had something special with ‘The Last Man on Earth.’ It’s one of those rare shows that continues to add depth and dimension to its unique premise, week after week,” said David Madden, president of entertainment for Fox Broadcasting Company, when the show was renewed for a second season.

Will writes and produces the show along with Chris Miller, Phil Lord and Seth Cohen.

“The Last Man on Earth” airs Sundays at 9:30/8:30c on FOX. Follow the show on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Tumblr to stay up-to-date and access exclusive content. If you need to catch up, watch the first 10 episodes of Season 2 online at FOX NOW.

The unexpected journey to making ‘The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story’

This is the first of two posts by Brad Simpson, executive producer of “The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story,” which premieres Feb. 2, at 10 p.m. EST on FX.

The journey to making “The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story” starts in a used bookstore in Vancouver roughly six years ago. I was shooting a film there when I spotted a copy of “The Run of His Life: The People v. O.J. Simpson” on the shelf. I bought it because I was a fan of Jeffrey Toobin, the journalist who wrote it. I had no idea that he’d made his reputation covering the O.J. case in the mid-1990s.

I brought the book to set, started reading it – and I couldn’t put it down. I turned to my producing partner Nina Jacobson and said, “You’ve got to read this. It’s a total page-turner, and it explodes everything you thought you knew about the O.J. Simpson trial.” Nina read it and tore through it in no time, too. Jeffrey’s writing brought the case to life in vivid detail – the oversize personalities, the clash of egos, and the twists and turns of the case. But he also had a thesis: that race was at the center of the case from the very beginning. Neither of us thought about optioning it. It was too complicated a story to tell as a feature.

The deal

Fast-forward a few years and we decided to expand into television. We made a production deal at FX Productions because we loved the shows they made and we loved the people who worked there. During my first meeting with Gina Balian, EVP of Limited Series at FX, she asked if there was anything I’d read that would work as a limited series. Jeffrey’s book popped into my head and I said, “Well, there was this book about the O.J. Simpson trial. It’s not really about O.J. – it’s about the lawyers and the way a slam-dunk case fell apart.” She instantly said, “We’ll buy it.” It was initially set up as a show for FX Productions to produce for Fox.

The writers

Nina and I went to work finding writers. Jeffrey’s book is about a serious subject, but it has larger-than-life characters and flashes of humor. We needed someone who could balance tone the way he did in his book. As a producer, you always put together a wish list of writers you’d love to work with but rarely get the person at the top. This time, however, we got the guys at the very top of our list: Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski. They’ve developed a completely distinctive voice and tone in movies like “Ed Wood,” “The People vs. Larry Flynt” and “Man on the Moon.” It turned out they’d just signed at CAA with the hope of getting into TV. They read it overnight and signed up.

Scott and Larry wrote a brilliant pilot and format. From there, we opened a writers’ room. We pulled together four great writers – D.V. DeVincentis, Joe Robert Cole, Maya Forbes and Wally Wolodarsky – and spent eight weeks crafting a 100-page bible. Working in the room with the writers was a new experience for us and it was incredibly fulfilling. We conducted it like a salon, first talking about the major issues of the case: race, class, domestic violence, celebrity and feminism. Then we narrowed down our key characters and crafted a season of TV.

Scott and Larry wrote a spellbinding second episode (“The Bronco Chase”) and we submitted it and the bible to Fox and FX. The material was loved internally but the project called for a massive scale. It had such ambition that there was a question as to how we were going to mount it. It was destined to be complicated and expensive, if it could be done at all.

Ryan Murphy sets things in motion

As we waited to hear if the show could be made, we got a call from Peter Rice. Ryan Murphy had called him to say he had read the O.J. scripts and would love to direct and produce. It turned out that Ryan, finding an unexpected gap in his schedule, had asked his agent Joe Cohen to send him the best unmade television scripts in town. Joe sent our first two episodes over and Ryan tore through them.

Ryan is the biggest name in television for a reason: Year after year he crafts groundbreaking shows that get America talking. But we had to wonder if he would see the show the way we did. Nina and I sat down with him and were thrilled (and relieved) to hear that he was interested in the show for the exact same reasons we were. He had always loved the film “Network” and saw this project as spiritually connected to it. He didn’t want to change our scripts – at least, not much. He wanted to augment them and make them more emotional. 

With the addition of Ryan, the show turned from a one-off into the first installment of “American Crime Story,” a spin-off of Ryan’s award-winning hit anthology series “American Horror Story.” On parallel planes, FX head John Landgraf had previously bought the “American Crime Story” pitch from Ryan, Dana Walden and Gary Newman at 20th Century Fox Television, with whom Ryan has an overall production deal. “American Crime Story” would be a scripted anthology series where a true crime is explored each year. Ryan, along with Dana and John, thought “The People v. O.J. Simpson” would be a good launch point for the “American Crime Story” franchise, and Dana was gracious enough to let us move the show from Fox over to FX, with Fox 21 joining FX Productions as a studio partner.

Casting the characters

It became clear just how ingenious Ryan was once we started the casting process. His reputation precedes him for a reason. He’s renowned for taking care of actors, casting them correctly and getting great performances out of them. And again, we had the experience where everyone on our wish list said yes. We were incredibly lucky to get all of our first choices. The combination of the scripts and Ryan’s reputation and vision was magnetic.

Casting Sarah Paulson as Marcia Clark was sort of fait accompli. Ryan casually asked us, “I’m thinking about Sarah. What do you think?” It turned out he’d already shown her the script and told her she was cast. But she’d have been our first choice, anyway. She’s perfect. Plus, she can’t say no to Ryan. She trusts him completely.

The second performer we cast was Cuba Gooding Jr. as O.J. We had a meeting and realized nobody else could play this fallen idol. Not only does Cuba have great skill and depth as an actor; he also brings the perfect energy. O.J. was a star – you couldn’t cast someone who didn’t have that likeability, charisma and charm. So hiring Cuba was a no-brainer.

Ryan had seen Courtney B. Vance perform on Broadway. He’s a Tony winner. We all admired him, and it was clear he was just the best actor to play Johnnie Cochran. We met him. We cast him. Done.

Photo credit: Frank Micelotta/FX
Brad Simpson, Sarah Paulson, Courtney B. Vance at the party following the premiere of FX’s “The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story” at STK Restaurant on January 27, 2016 in Los Angeles, California.

Scott Alexander had the idea of offering the role of Robert Kardashian to David Schwimmer, but David had resisted coming back to TV since his many years on the smash hit “Friends.” Fortuitously, Nina had gone to school with David and knew him. David trusted her. He read the scripts and it was a quick conversation. He just wanted to hear that we were serious and planned to execute the project exactly the way the scripts were written.

From there, Ryan’s great casting instincts landed us Selma Blair to play Kris Jenner, Malcolm-Jamal Warner to portray “A.C.” Cowlings and Nathan Lane as F. Lee Bailey. All were unexpected choices who in hindsight make perfect sense.

The toughest character to cast was Chris Darden. We needed someone who was compelling as an actor and yet who could be overshadowed by Johnnie Cochran. We read hundreds of actors, and Sterling K. Brown became one of the truly great discoveries of the show. We already knew Sterling from “Army Wives,” where he played an attractive leading man. He had been in “Starved,” one of FX’s early comedy series in 2006. But he was unrecognizable in his audition. He came in and killed it. He has one of the toughest roles: Everyone else gets to have these big flashy speeches, but he has to do all of this internal stuff. And he was just amazing.

The only actor we wanted who played hard-to-get was John Travolta. Ryan has always loved him, and Nina had made several movies with him. When they went to meet with him about playing Robert Shapiro, I thought it was a fool’s errand. John hadn’t done a TV series since “Welcome Back, Kotter” in the 70s. There was no way he would sign on.

He was very hesitant and concerned and had a lot of questions. It took four months, but John eventually agreed to play Robert Shapiro. Cuba told us that when Travolta signed on, it validated his own choice to play O.J.

Attention to detail

With this unbelievable cast in place, we finally started shooting last spring. It stretched for 110 days in locations all over L.A. We were able to use some of the actual locations, like inside Kardashian’s real house. We re-created Nicole’s condo entrance on Bundy and closed down a freeway for our recreation of the Bronco chase. We meticulously recreated Ito’s courtroom on a sound stage, down to the doorknobs and chairs. 

As first-timers working in television, we had been assured that non-writing TV producers don’t need to do that much, but we found it was the opposite. We rolled up our sleeves and paid attention to every detail. We wanted every element to be perfect – from what objects Johnnie had on his desk to the casting of the day players. What helped immeasurably was having Ryan as a mentor. He has made literally hundreds of hours of TV and knows how it all works up, down and sideways. We weren’t really prepared for the speed and immediacy of TV, or for the sheer amount of work and intensity of preparation. Prepping while we were shooting was just a new, exhilarating and often nail-biting experience.

That said, we were incredibly lucky to be in business with FX and Fox 21. John Landgraf, Dana Walden and Gary Newman headed a literal dream team of executives that helped us through the process. They all understand that a key part of their job is to let creators do their work and give them the support that they need. That made it a great partnership. They supported the crazy ambition of this show. We had a complicated shooting schedule and did things you don’t do in TV (like close down a freeway). They backed us the whole way.

As we edited the show, we started to realize how timely all our themes had become. I wish we could say we were geniuses and timed it to hit the zeitgeist just right, but we could never have envisioned when we started working on this series three years ago that the country would become obsessed with true crime, and that protests over police misconduct would break out again.

Brad’s next post about why the O.J. Simpson trial is as relevant as ever will be published tomorrow.

Read more about “The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story” and follow the show’s Twitter and Facebook accounts for exclusive content. The limited series premieres Feb. 2, at 10 p.m. EST on FX.

 

21st Century Fox provides training and a new studio for young female broadcast journalists

The Television Club at Bishop Kearney High School recently received a state-of-the-art renovation of its studio, thanks to 21st Century Fox. The company purchased new equipment for the school’s student-run news station, WBKS, and professionals from Fox 5 trained the students on how to operate it. The initiative comes as part of the company’s commitment to support and develop the next generation of great storytellers. The Brooklyn-based high school’s daily news broadcasts are much improved since the club started more than 20 years ago, and this new equipment will enhance their capabilities even further. The club has become a big draw for incoming students.

To learn more about the school’s journey to its new studio, read the 21st Century Fox Social Impact post.

‘Rosewood’ returns to FOX tonight at 8/7c to bring you more of the crime-solving pathologist

Dr. Beaumont Rosewood Jr. is a perceptive private pathologist who has a gift for noticing details in bodies that others usually miss. This talent makes Rosewood, the title character for the FOX series that goes by the same name, a helpful partner for the Miami Police Department, not to mention an entertaining character to watch. “Rosewood” makes its return tonight, March 2, at 8/7c. The midseason premiere is titled “Paralytics and Priorities.”

The drama, which is in its first season, stars Morris Chestnut as Rosewood and Jaina Lee Ortiz as his partner, Detective Annalise Villa. The show’s cast also includes Lorraine Toussaint, Gabrielle Dennis, Anna Konkle and Domenick Lombardozzi. Taye Diggs headlines a list of recurring guest stars. “Rosewood” was created by Todd Harthan.

“’Rosewood’ has proven to be a real self-starter for us, which is a tremendous feat on this highly competitive night,” said David Madden, president of entertainment for Fox Broadcasting Company, after the show got a full-season order. “Todd Harthan, Morris, Jaina, Lorraine and the entire cast and crew have done a fantastic job creating a gorgeous, sexy world that is the perfect complement to ‘Empire.’”

“Rosewood” airs Wednesdays at 8/7c on FOX. Follow the show on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to stay up-to-date and access exclusive content. If you need to catch up on the show’s first 10 episodes, you can watch them all online at FOX NOW.

Eric Shanks talks about RSNs, sports in India and non-event sports programming at Morgan Stanley conference

Eric Shanks, FOX Sports president, COO and executive producer, spoke with Morgan Stanley analyst Benjamin Daniel Swinburne at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference today. During the 38-minute discussion, Eric touched on a wide range of topics, including regional sports networks (RSNs), the big sports opportunity in India and the importance of non-event sports programming.

On rising sports consumption: “Over the last 10 years, sports consumption has grown by over 9 billion hours, up 41%. So, it’s one of the key areas that is not only historically a key component of driving growth for our business, but it’s one of the sectors within the entertainment portfolio that is clearly growing.”

On FOX’s strong sports market share: “A big part of our business is the regional sports network, and we take into account the total consumption of sports minutes throughout the year. The market share is actually much closer than you would think. The leader is about 30% and FOX is at about 26% of total market share of sports, and then the next closest is down to about 18%.”

The importance of RSN business scale: “The difference between our RSN business and some of the others is really our scale. Scale matters in this business, and we have rights relationships with half of the professional teams in this country… And we’ve tried to make sure that we have the breadth of those local relationships… You don’t want to have a single-team RSN. So strategically we have at least a baseball team, an NBA team, you’d like to have a winter sport, if not two baseball teams, as in the case in Florida. So scale and the ability to actually own a territory when you are going into those discussions, we believe, matters. I think we’ve been very, very good at not only concentrating in certain markets and avoiding markets that kind of send trouble signs… I feel like we’ve been very disciplined in not saying that we have to do something… The RSN deals are still for the most part longer than national deals. So, you really are true partners with these teams and again being able to manage the business, so that you are managing the business with shared goals.”

On the big opportunity in India: “India is a market dominated by one central sport, but it’s a sports-hungry country. So there are opportunities, like what we’re doing, to build completely new sports and take ownership positions in those sports in countries like India… Uday [Shankar] and Nitin [Kukreja], running sports and running Star in India, quickly professionalized [the Pro Kabaddi league], which we own now in India, and it’s averaging in its second season about 135 million people per game… We own an equity position in the Indian soccer league, the Indian Super League. So, there are real opportunities in that country to try things, to see what sticks.”

On non-event sports programming: “I think that what we see is, based on some consumer viewing trends and consumption habits – we really are starting to put a focus on our non-event programming… I think what we’re seeing is a clear sign from the consumers – what they want in those off-hours that you are not doing a pregame show, postgame show or a live event, and I think that’s the [thing] we’ve brought in a new team to really focus on.”

On a strong portfolio of rights: “I think that the portfolio of rights that we have really kind of dovetail well with what a lot of the distributors want to do with some of their future packages. We have really young sports with a lot of volume. We have the largest soccer portfolio in this country. Soccer fits really well with distributors that want to launch either new streaming services or new OTT services. UFC is a really young sport.”

On Fox Sports 1: “I think that Fox Sports 1 was up 30%, total day rating. So that’s growth that you really can’t ignore.”

On advertising in sports: “[In] the sports market, what we’re seeing really, I think, is an acknowledgment that of all of the different places that people can advertise, there really is a trust and a safety inside of sports. You know where your brand is next to. You know that it’s being consumed 95% live.”

On the strength of RSNs: “Of 100 analysts, I would [ask] which channel they watch the most. And if they’re in a market where we have an RSN, more than likely, one of the top three channels they watch is an RSN.”

To hear more of Eric’s discussion, listen to the recorded webcast.

David Hill talks Oscars production: Acceptance speech innovation, diversity, Chris Rock and more

David Hill had a storied, decades-long career with 21CF in which he led and helped launch and establish many of its television businesses, including co-founding Sky Television, the Fox Network, FOX Sports and the FOX regional sports networks. Last year, David launched a 21CF-backed production venture called HILLY, which is co-producing the 88th Academy Awards. We spoke with David to see what he has up his sleeve for the big awards show, hear his thoughts on the conversations about diversity and ask what his future holds.

You’re known for such on-air sports innovations as the constant score and time graphics, the superimposed first-down line, and the glowing hockey puck – should we expect a countdown clock during acceptance speeches on the screen or some other on-screen innovation during the Oscars?

All those things were designed to make life simpler for the viewer. My whole philosophy is that television should make life easier for the viewer, rather than harder. If you look at what I’ve done, all has been aimed to enhance the consumer’s viewing experience and to add to their enjoyment of the experience.

Researching the Oscars, it became obvious that what could improve the viewing experience of the show was to turn the acceptance speeches into features. After all, it is an award show, and there are 24 awards, so there are 24 speeches, and in terms of show time, they are the main element. So, how do we make the speeches compelling – or far more importantly, what could we do to give the winners an opportunity to make themselves compelling?

Because in many, many cases, by the time the winner had thanked a whole list of people, when they started to say something powerful, something insightful, something emotional – the dreaded music started to play, signifying their time was up, and they were cut off, and the viewers are denied hearing the thoughts of a person who had, that night, shown they were the very best at what it was they’d done in the world of movies!

So the thought was: Why not get the nominees to give us a list of the people they wish to thank?

We run it as a bottom-of-screen scroll as they walk up to the stage, which frees them to speak from the heart about the work, about their passion, about the person who inspired their career.

The benefits are obvious. There’s no awkward fumbling for lists, there are no embarrassing moments of temporary amnesia – and believe me, there have been many, many stars who have forgotten to thank their husbands, wives, directors, whatever. And far more importantly, the recipient of the thanks has a permanent record of gratitude, which they can keep as a screen grab forever!

Whether or not it will work, we don’t know. But it’s something that we believe will make things better for the viewer and for the award recipient, because it gives them a chance to be sincere and emotional and, as I said before, to speak from the heart.

You and Reginald Hudlin talked about creating a broader narrative across awards. What will this look like?

One of the things that we found confusing in the past is that the awards were given out in an ad hoc manner. So all of a sudden you go from one award to the other and it would appear to be a non sequitur. What we’re doing giving awards in the order of how a film is made. So everything starts with the script – “In the beginning was the Word” – and as you get a script, then what you need is a production designer, then a costume designer, then makeup and hairstyling, then a cameraman, then you need to edit it, then you need to put the audio in, then you need the visual effects.

So the awards will go out in order so that there is a buildup, and the continuing narrative thread of the show is that you are driving the viewer toward the climax, which in the case of the Oscars is the best actor, the best actress and the best picture.

As the producer of a live show, how do you approach or prepare for something like the controversy about diversity?

Before this even hit, our plan was to be the most diverse Oscars ever. So we’re staying the course, and it was something we were very aware of going into this, particularly because of what happened last year. You never think that lightning’s going to strike twice, but it did.

How much freedom does Chris Rock have? Do you know what will be in his monologue?

I have no idea what he’s going to say. All I know is that the reason we chose Chris was because he’s whip-smart, and his humor is broadly based on social consciousness. We’re saying, “This is your stage, this is your moment – it’s up to you.” So I have no idea what Chris is going to say about what. I’m more than comfortable giving him that latitude because of his work, and the key thing with Chris is that he’s a hard worker – he prepares for absolutely everything he does, so I have no worries. I look forward to being startled, amazed and laughing hysterically when he goes on stage on the 28th.

You’ve produced Super Bowl telecasts and won an Emmy for the World Series. How does the Oscars compare to those productions?

All television productions are effectively the same. Any television show – any successful television show – is a myriad of seemingly meaningless moments strung together. Unless each of those moments is polished and honed and comes together at the right place, the show isn’t as fulfilling and, therefore, isn’t as great as you would have hoped.

It’s just a hell of a lot of working on things that might seem meaningless in isolation – like the wording of a script, or the selection of music, or the look of a graphic, or the way a piece is edited. You spend an inordinate amount of time visualizing the finished product, and editing and working. It doesn’t matter if you’re doing a drama, a comedy, a Super Bowl or the Oscars – the work is pretty much the same. You dream up a format and you juxtapose the acts together the best way possible, so the viewer has a fulfilling emotional experience.

The similarities are quite remarkable; the difference being, of course, that for a sports event, the cast is there, the costumes are there, the stage is there, the lighting’s there, and all you do is react to what’s happening on that stage. At the Oscars, or any other show, you start with a dark room and then you need to visualize the stage and you need to visualize the lighting – so you work from the back out. Everything that the viewer sees has to be created by the producer, unlike a sports event where the main act is put together by someone else – Major League Baseball or the National Football League, for example.

You recently started Hilly Productions, and with the Oscars you’re clearly starting small. Where do you go from here? What’s next?

My great dream was sparked when I was working with National Geographic. I’ve been bitten by this bug that I want to start a weekly prime time program on network television based on science. The aim would be to inspire a kid in every school in America to have a passion about science and then to pursue that through university and into their career, because if there’s one thing this country needs, it’s more scientists, more engineers. And I think the simplest way to do that is to make science sexy.

I hope Hilly can bring this show about science that is funny, relevant and entertaining, and which – like all good TV shows – has a gasp, a sigh and a tear, and a sense of satisfaction at the end of it. This has become an obsession, and I will not rest until I get that done.

Bitnami